Search for: "LEHMAN v. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
http://tinyurl.com/yho6hyl Grunstein v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:54 am
Examples are drawn from research problems that became evident in Abbott v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:08 pm
“Traditionally, securities market regulation and law enforcement relied upon a ‘three legged stool’ of the SEC, federal and state attorneys general and investor actions. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
(IP Spotlight) (Excess copyright) (Patent Docs) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (IP Law Observer) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (IP Spotlight) (The Prior Art) (Patent Baristas) (EFF) (Patent Prospector) (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IP Updates) (Daily Dose of IP) (PLI) (Green Patent… [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:21 am
The court’s opinion in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:21 am
The court’s opinion in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
Indeed, kids do a lot of copying that isn’t even noticed as copying: trace the letters to learn how to write; instruction where we have students watch then do, which is to say copy, then teach, which is to say have others copy you; perhaps this can often be distinguished as processes v. outputs, but copying letters is copying outputs, not just tasks. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
(Ars Technica) RIAA – Shahanda Moursy sues RIAA for fraud, abuse and legal sham (TorrentFreak) Tenenbaum, Joel – Defence team’s unorthodox tactics in illegal file-swapping case incurs judge’s displeasure (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court New Hampshire: Domaining registrar defeats cybersquatting lawsuit: Philbrick v eNom, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (The Trademark Blog) District Court N D… [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
11 May 2007, 3:43 pm
Case name is Howard v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:07 pm
In the case, Otis Wayne Phillips v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Bank v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:15 am
V. [read post]
