Search for: "LEHMAN v. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 362
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 2:08 pm
“Traditionally, securities market regulation and law enforcement relied upon a ‘three legged stool’ of the SEC, federal and state attorneys general and investor actions. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:45 am
Petersburg, Florida v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:15 am
V. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:28 am
Given the similarities in the legal theories alleged by the plaintiffs in all three cases, Judge Kaplan granted the motions to dismiss in both Tsereteli and Indymac for the reasons stated in his written opinion for In re: Lehman Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:41 pm
Fire sales destroyed Lehman’s ability to honor these claims. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
The California-based Specialty Wine Retailers Association had challenged the Texas law to enable consumers to buy wine from out-of-state retailers. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
But shareholders should have tools and rights that would enable them to secure such a state of affairs. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
Currently, there is no system in place to responsibly shut down a failing financial company like AIG or Lehman Brothers. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
I do think that Bear and Lehman's adoption of corporate structures contributed to their downfalls. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:59 am
See Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:49 am
SEC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:29 am
The ruling in Tafas v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
In the Lehman v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:19 am
Co. v Shearson Lehman Hutton, 84 NY2d 309, 318 [1994], quoting Restatement [Second] of Conflict of Laws § 193). [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:12 pm
On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court concluded that Kahn v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:47 pm
Under title 15 of the United States Code, it is unlawful for a person to engage in short selling that is “in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:53 am
Greenberg v Mallick Management, Inc., 527 N.E. 2d 943, 949 (Ill. [read post]
