Search for: "LIVINGSTON v. STATE" Results 161 - 180 of 543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2014, 7:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Katzmann, Hall and Livingston) says No Dice. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:04 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court threw out the case, but the Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Calabresi and Livingston) reinstates it.The Second Circuit revives the claim under the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Calabresi, Livingston and Chin) says Ford states a claim.Ford alleges that a corrections officer threatened "to put some kind of substance in plaintiff’s hot water for writing complance [sic] and grievances to defendant Smith for being denied his right to practice his religion. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Livingston and Droney) disagrees, over the dissent of Judge Katzmann, who would certify this state law situation to the New York Court of Appeals, which sometimes takes up issues like this to help the Second Circuit reach the proper result.We got ourselves a case of statutory construction. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Current rules give unfair advantage to mass-litigation attorneys targeting Texas consumersLabeau v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 8:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals disagrees.The case is Jewish People for the Betterment of Westhampton Beach v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:36 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The trial court ruled against Gilman on his defamation suit and in Gilman v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:53 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" The state regulations require that prison officials resolve the grievance appeal within 30 days. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am by INFORRM
But not everything a politician says is political (see Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England [2006] EWHC 2533 (Admin) [36] where it was judged that the then-London mayor Ken Livingstone’s comments were not expressing political opinion, but were instead to be seen as simply as the offensive abuse of a journalist). [read post]