Search for: "LOWRY v. LOWRY" Results 61 - 80 of 187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2006, 5:52 pm
Inequitable Conduct: Supreme Court has denied certiorari in Ferring v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Police can take her into custody under Illinois law” [Jeffrey Schwab, Illinois Policy] So many stars to sue: Huang v. leading Hollywood names [Kevin Underhill, Lowering the Bar] Morgan Spurlock’s claim in 2004’s Super Size Me of eating only McDonald’s food for a month and coming out as a physical wreck with liver damage was one that later researchers failed to replicate; now confessional memoir sheds further doubt on baseline assertions essential to the famous… [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:42 pm by Ray Dowd
(disclosure - the author represented the Grosz heirs in Grosz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 10:07 pm by Old Fox
v=pSRlRR_sA98Jonah Gldberg had this to say about the rather revealing sentiments expressed by Melissa Harris-Perry in an MSNBC “Lean Forward” clip:Before we get to all that, a word about the ad campaign itself. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:35 am
 Seriously, after National Review‘s Rich Lowry suggested on Fox News that Carly Fiorina emasculated Trump in the last primary debate, Trump said Lowry should not be allowed on air and should be fined by the FCC. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:49 am by Riana Harvey
It may be found that combinations of non-protectable elements qualify for such protection; however, as set out in Satava v Lowry, “only if those elements are numbers enough and their selection and arrangement original enough that their combination constitutes an original work of authorship”. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:30 am
Among those set to speak are Mary McLeod (left), Principal Deputy Legal Adviser at the State Department, and Luis Guillermo Vélez, Colombia's Superintendent of Corporations. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:38 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Moderator: Jill Rhodes; Discussants: Judith Miller, Keith Lowry and Kathleen Rice [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 10:09 am by Riana Harvey
A mere simplistic arrangement of non-protectable elements would not demonstrate the level of creativity necessary to warrant protection - as set out in Satava v Lowry. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:13 am by Jani Ihalainen
They did, however, emphasise that, as was set in Satava v Lowry, "…an artist may obtain a copyright by varying the background, lighting, perspective, animal pose, animal attitude, and animal coat and texture, but that will earn the artist only a narrow degree of copyright protection". [read post]