Search for: "LOWRY v. LOWRY" Results 61 - 80 of 197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
In a recent decision, Devore-Thompson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:14 pm
It's admittedly not an especially good en banc panel draw for Chief Judge Thomas. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by INFORRM
Section 4 had been discussed in Barron v Vines [2015] EWHC 1161 (QB) (29 April 2015), and Yeo v Times Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWHC 3375 (QB) (25 November 2015), but Economou v de Freitas is the first time it has been successfully invoked. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 9:09 pm
  Authors include: Roger V Skalbeck, University of Richmond Law School. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:12 pm by Chris Castle
The Lowry Clause in Pandora’s supposedly transparent license allows Pandora to use your songs, run their new service and not account to you or pay you and the only thing you can do about it is figure it out later. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:45 am by Chris Castle
The Lowry Clause in Pandora’s supposedly transparent license allows Pandora to use your songs, run their new service and not account to you or pay you and the only thing you can do about it is figure it out later. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:19 am by Liisa Speaker
The Court of Appeals disagreed in a December 2014 unpublished ruling, Lowry v Lauren Bienentock & Associates, Inc (Docket No. 317516). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am by Zack Bluestone
Also, on Tuesday, the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs confirmed that oral arguments for the merits portion of the Republic of the Philippines v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 3:32 pm by Zack Bluestone
Two days later, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) ruled that it has jurisdiction to hear the Philippines v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:35 am
 Seriously, after National Review‘s Rich Lowry suggested on Fox News that Carly Fiorina emasculated Trump in the last primary debate, Trump said Lowry should not be allowed on air and should be fined by the FCC. [read post]