Search for: "LOWRY v. LOWRY" Results 81 - 100 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2018, 1:13 am by Jani Ihalainen
They did, however, emphasise that, as was set in Satava v Lowry, "…an artist may obtain a copyright by varying the background, lighting, perspective, animal pose, animal attitude, and animal coat and texture, but that will earn the artist only a narrow degree of copyright protection". [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 10:09 am by Riana Harvey
A mere simplistic arrangement of non-protectable elements would not demonstrate the level of creativity necessary to warrant protection - as set out in Satava v Lowry. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Writes NR editor Rich Lowry: Usually, you don’t welcome a nuisance lawsuit, because it’s a nuisance. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Len Boselovic covers Sandifer v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 9:09 pm
  Authors include: Roger V Skalbeck, University of Richmond Law School. [read post]