Search for: "LYLE v. BAKER" Results 1 - 20 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2014, 7:48 pm
Lyle Denniston is reporting: Today at "SCOTUSblog," he has posts titled "New birth-control rules found too demanding" and "Testing the status of Baker v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covers these developments for this blog; other coverage comes from Sam Baker of The Hill. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston looks at the factors that may underlie the Supreme Court’s one-sentence order on Wednesday denying a request to expedite review of a partisan-gerrymandering case from Maryland, Benisek v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
  Other previews come from Nina Totenberg of NPR and Thomas Baker for the American Bar Association. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm by Molly Runkle
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:09 am by Jenny Egan
In today’s Washington Post, Edwin Meese has an op-ed piece in which he argues that Judge Walker’s decision ignored binding Supreme Court precedent – namely, Baker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities.TOC after the jump. 1 R v Pease (1832) MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH2 Burón v Denman (1848) CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO3 George v Skivington (1869) DAVID IBBETSON4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) MICHAEL LOBBAN5 Woodley v Metropolitan… [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am by Amy Howe
”    In the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro covers yesterday’s second oral argument, in Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am by Nabiha Syed
With the redistricting process drawing nearer, Kenneth Jost of Jost on Justice argues that although the Court “struck a major struck a major blow for political democracy a half century ago by establishing the ‘one person, one vote’ rule for electoral districts” in Baker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
As Lyle Denniston reported for this blog, the Court has reacted to intense interest by creating a special page for all ACA-related filings.  [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Christie v. [read post]