Search for: "Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2015, 10:06 am
As a result, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) was created to enforce those rights. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
The brief filed on appeal on behalf of Teamsters Union Local 456 adds the following:Ricci was a truck driver member of . . . [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 2:36 pm
Teamsters Union Local 456, 781 F.3d 25 (2d Cir. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 5:38 am
Weigand v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:00 am
Weigand v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
Maryland v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Attempts at legislative reform are also well underway—the “Save Local Business Act,” which would amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act to limit joint employer liability, currently has bipartisan support in the U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Attempts at legislative reform are also well underway—the “Save Local Business Act,” which would amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act to limit joint employer liability, currently has bipartisan support in the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:27 am
A recent decision by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) addressed an employee’s claim that a labor union breached this duty by discriminating against her on the basis of sex. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
UberX and UberBLACK Drivers Are Not Employees for Purposes of the NLRA According to the NLRB General Counsel’s Division of Advice (GC), Uber’s UberX and UberBLACK drivers are independent contractors exempt from the rights and protections of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), including the right to form and join unions. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:32 pm
Labor counsel should be consulted to explore how to make the most of this new development. [1] FedEx Home Delivery v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 6:40 am
Though FedEx Freight contended that the local should represent the dockworkers as well because drivers and dockworkers shared a community of interest, the Board disagreed and found a drivers-only unit was proper. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:14 am
The transit authority did not engage in viewpoint discrimination and no facial challenge was made to the revised advertising policy as a whole; rather, the union brought a successful “as applied” challenge, and established a violation of its First Amendment rights (Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1015 v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm
The appeals court’s decision in Construction and General Laborers’ Union No. 330 v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:00 pm
The reasoning in Miscellaneous Employees, Teamsters, Local Union No. 987 of Alberta v. 1093507 Alberta Ltd. o/a Access Taxi is mirrored in the other three decisions, Sun Taxi, United Class Cabs, and Barrel Taxi. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 12:16 pm
On August 27, 2015, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued its highly anticipated decision in Browning-Ferris Indus. of California, et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:02 pm
Kraft Foods and the union, Local 538 of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union, agreed under the collective bargaining agreement that this time is not compensable. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:17 pm
An NLRB regional director issued an unfair labor practices order against FedEx, and the Board granted summary judgment in favor of the union. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]
