Search for: "Lackey v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
  If they keep this up until a successor to Justice Scalia is seated, Friedrichs’s counsel may have a Lackey claim of his own. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:37 am by Kent Scheidegger
The United States Supreme Court this morning took up two capital cases from Texas, Moore v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
The Court granted cert. in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  That attack is based on the Supreme Court's decision Ring v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:44 am by Benjamin Wittes
— Anne-Marie Slaughter (@SlaughterAM) October 17, 2015 Putin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  Although he had exhausted his claim based on Lackey v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm by Sandy Levinson
  So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck
If anything, Justice Kennedy’s first query of the day proved the point, when he encouraged Urbanski to turn to the second question presented (which the Justices had added) on whether, on the merits, the Ninth Circuit’s de novo analysis of the harmlessness of the state trial court’s error had misapplied the Supreme Court’s standard for prejudice under Brecht v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
We depart from our usual practice of hermetically sealing new and old relists to note that Bowers’ Lackey claim got some new company this week: the newly relisted Davis v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:42 am by John Elwood
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 12:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
And while Jefferson continued to insist, even when retired, that the federal and state governments represented two independent and equal sovereigns, Marshall, in McCulloch v. [read post]