Search for: "Lackey v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2016, 3:52 pm
Circuit in Cook v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times reports that this issue stems a 2001 court decision in Zadvydas v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
If they keep this up until a successor to Justice Scalia is seated, Friedrichs’s counsel may have a Lackey claim of his own. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:37 am
The United States Supreme Court this morning took up two capital cases from Texas, Moore v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am
The Court granted cert. in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 9:24 am
In Cespedes v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:13 am
Facts: This case (Sine v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
That attack is based on the Supreme Court's decision Ring v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:44 am
— Anne-Marie Slaughter (@SlaughterAM) October 17, 2015 Putin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
Although he had exhausted his claim based on Lackey v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
If anything, Justice Kennedy’s first query of the day proved the point, when he encouraged Urbanski to turn to the second question presented (which the Justices had added) on whether, on the merits, the Ninth Circuit’s de novo analysis of the harmlessness of the state trial court’s error had misapplied the Supreme Court’s standard for prejudice under Brecht v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
We depart from our usual practice of hermetically sealing new and old relists to note that Bowers’ Lackey claim got some new company this week: the newly relisted Davis v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:33 am
Barger v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am
Plywood Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
