Search for: "Lackey v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
Until recently, though, I was unaware of Ray v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
Until recently, though, I was unaware of Ray v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
Until recently, though, I was unaware of Ray v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:04 am
State Employees’ Retirement System, Case No. 141909, back to the State Employees’ Retirement Board for reconsideration of petitioner’s request for benefits in light of Nason v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:29 am
This is simply about “RIGHT v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am
On the downside: terrible network latency.Crypto Anarchy: Sean Hastings and Ryan Lackey came out of a tradition that prized better living through cryptography. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
State, Baldwin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Coton v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:32 pm
That concurrence said, “While I fully concur in today’s majority opinion, I write separately to briefly state that in addition to the reasons set forth by the majority to conclude that Issue II has no merit, I would also rely on the reasoning set forth in the dissent in Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 8:11 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:35 am
Lackey, Jr. of Mayer Brown states that "Lawyers start from a place of being very risk averse, and we are very careful of what we do. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 7:33 am
Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented (pdf), saying Johnson's situation was "as compelling a case" as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
Stevens writing for himself and Breyer continued a theme started in his 1995 dissent to Lackey v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 10:35 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:26 am
District Judge - United States CourthouseMitchell H. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:36 am
He said the United States did not use "brute force" and the memos prove detainees weren't tortured. [read post]
