Search for: "Ladd v. Ladd" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2007, 5:56 pm
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Carol Edmead ruled last week in Laddcap Value Partners, LP v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 8:01 am by Dave
In Powell v Dacorum BC [2019] EWCA Civ 29 and Forward v Aldwyck Housing Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 24 (QB), the question of the effect of the public sector equality duty under s. 149, Equality Act 2010, on possession proceedings where there had been drugs problems at the property was in issue. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:06 pm
There was a discretion to admit fresh evidence on an application by the party seeking to adduce it; however, one should exercise that discretion in accordance with the principles articulated by the Court of Appeal in Ladd v Marshall and the overriding objective of dealing with the case justly and at proportionate cost under the CPR, r.1.1.* In this case, the new evidence could plainly have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use at first instance. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 1:50 pm by NL
Windsor and District Housing Association v Hewitt [2011] EWCA Civ 1096 (Not on Bailii or elsewhere. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
  The FRAND element cannot be considered separately for the purpose of the forum conveniens analysis.Relevance of the new evidenceAlthough the new evidence in relation to the Chinese Court Guidelines would be admissible under the first Ladd v Marshall test (couldn't have been submitted at first instance trial) it did not meet the second criteria of having an influence on the outcome of the case. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:04 am by NL
Bank of Scotland v Pereira & Pain & Pain [2011] EWCA Civ 241 This is a rather odd one. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:04 am by NL
Bank of Scotland v Pereira & Pain & Pain [2011] EWCA Civ 241 This is a rather odd one. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Sales LJ was unconvinced that the criteria set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 – intended to reflect the balance of justice in relation to applications to admit fresh evidence – had not been satisfied and KV was unable to demonstrate that evidence such as Dr Cohen’s report could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use earlier. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Yellow Freight Sys., 892 F.2d 74 (4th Cir. 1989)(pro se complaint); Ladd Furniture, Inc. v. [read post]