Search for: "Laird v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
The plaintiffs’ claims thus amounted only to “[a]llegations of a subjective ‘chill’” of the kind that failed to supply standing in Laird v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Laird and (indirectly) in Marbury; a famously slippery opinion by Chief Justice Marshall.1804:  Jefferson is reelected with a large majority in Congress and confirms his party's preeminence.1828:  Jackson wins the Presidency and creates the modern Democratic Party.1830:  Congress enacts the Removal Act to "assist" the Cherokee Nation's departure from Georgia, which is fiercely opposed by a coalition that becomes the Whig Party.1832:  The Supreme Court… [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Laird v Tatum (1972) (noting that a plaintiff's fear that an "agency might in the future take some other and additional action detrimental to [plaintiff]" was not enough to establish injury-in-fact). [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 7:44 am
In the thinly-reasoned opinion of Stuart v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:14 am by Danielle Citron
 Questions about the Court’s contemporary recusal practice date back to Chief Justice Rehnquist’s decision to participate in the Laird v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]