Search for: "Laird v. Tatum" Results 21 - 28 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2020, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Laird v Tatum (1972) (noting that a plaintiff's fear that an "agency might in the future take some other and additional action detrimental to [plaintiff]" was not enough to establish injury-in-fact). [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 12:10 pm
Before many of us grew accustomed to the Rehnquist Court's unfortunately dismissive reaction to "chilling effect" arguments of the sort that were routine in Justice Brennan's day and that came to seem adventuresome only in an era that could take decisions like Laird v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
This is one of a continuing series of articles the blog will publish over the next several weeks, explaining more fully the new federal health care law, and the Supreme Court’s review of the constitutionality of key parts of that law.   [read post]