Search for: "Lake v. Civil Service Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2016, 1:09 pm by Sme
Salt Lake City Corporation (Utah, April 7, 2016) (reversing Civil Service Commission determination that it lacked jurisdiction over Hollenbach's termination appeal because filing applies upon mail cancellation)MiscellaneousCrane-Jenkins v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, in Scherbyn v Wayne-Finger Lakes BOCES, 77 NY2d 753, the Court of Appeals held that where the rules of a civil service commission specifically set out the reasons for which a probationary employee may be dismissed, the appointing authority's broad discretion with respect to terminating the services of probationers is subject to the limitations imposed by those standards. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This is an action for false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and civil rights violations which stems from plaintiff's arrest in the Village of Lake Placid, Essex County, on 2 November 1995 for rape and sodomy in the first degree. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 3:04 pm by Unknown
Cooley (Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Police; Exclusionary Rule) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.htmlKalispel Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:15 am
An educator may accrue tenure and seniority rights in both an administrative and teacher tenure area simultaneously under certain circumstancesNancy Pearse v Board of Education of the Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake Central School District, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision #16,159The Commissioner of Education sustained, in part, an appeal filed by Nancy Pearse challenging the determination of the Board of Education of the Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake Central… [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:41 am by E.L. Lipman
While the challenges to the registration provisions were less in doubt than the challenges to civil commitment provisions, the panel's decision in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:14 am
In some instances the rules of the civil service commission having jurisdiction may impose limitations controlling the termination of an individual during his or her probationary period. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
”* §75.3, in pertinent part, provides that “If such officer or employee is found guilty, a copy of the charges, his written answer thereto, a transcript of the hearing, and the determination shall be filed in the office of the department or agency in which he has been employed, and a copy thereof shall be filed with the civil service commission having jurisdiction over such position. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. 2nd District.Jurisdiction -- Non-residents -- Service of process -- Service by publication pursuant to Venezuelan law was sufficient to confer in personam jurisdiction where service was made in compliance with Hague Service Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters -- Personal service is not required for Florida court to have jurisdiction to… [read post]
12 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Bruso’s claim that erred in refusing to admit into evidence the Civil Service Commission's Manual of Procedure in Disciplinary Actions, the Appellate Division ruled that the Hearing Officer, properly excluded the Commission’s Manual. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 7:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Cooley (Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Police; Exclusionary Rule)Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html Kalispel Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will decide whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding, “Chief Justice John Roberts might ultimately himself prove to be just as important. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:25 am by Susan Brenner
(As I noted in an earlier post, parties can take the 5th Amendment privilege in the context of civil litigation as long as their testimony would implicate them in the commission of a crime.) [read post]