Search for: "Lamb v. York" Results 21 - 40 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 11:02 am by Tom Lamb
Merck & Co., Inc., 09 Civ. 4282 (JFK), is scheduled for trial on May 7, 2012; and, Spano v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm by Tom Lamb
Allowing Supplemental Applications For Proposed Labeling Changes Might End Federal Preemption Shield From Legal Liability That Came With Mensing Ruling (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)This July 3, 2013 headline from a New York Times (NYT) article by Katie Thomas, "F.D.A. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Given the continuous nature of Breslin's assignment, the light-duty standard set forth in 2 NYCRR 364.3 (b) was properly applied to petitioners' application for disability retirement benefits (see Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Vicks v Hevesi, 45 AD3d at 1038; see also Matter of Lamb v DiNapoli, 128 AD3d at 1321). [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
    From the March 4, 2008 article, "Court Allows Suit Against Drug Maker", by New York Times reporter Linda Greenhouse:This case, Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:31 am
Delaware courts have never found a MAE in the context of a merger agreement, and Wolinsky himself helped to litigate the precedent-setting case on the issue, IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:21 am by Laurence Hooper
Lamb didn’t pass this test, he said, echoing several aspects of a 2014 Second Circuit decision, Nielsen v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:52 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– New York attorney Jacob Hollinger of McDermott Will & Emery on the firm’s blog, Energy Business Law A Coffee Monopoly? [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:28 pm
Davis et al, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, and SEC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:38 pm
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog Upcoming CLE event: The Impact of Iasenza v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:31 am by Joe Palazzolo
Boast argued the issue of antitrust extraterritoriality before the Supreme Court in Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]