Search for: "Lamden v. La Jolla Shores Clubdominium Homeowners Assn. (1999)"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 11:52 am
La Jolla Shores Clubdominium Homeowners Assn. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 249 ("Lamden"), the California Supreme Court established what is known as the "Rule of Judicial Deference" or "Lamden Rule" that, in sum, requires courts to defer to decisions made by a HOA's Board of Directors regarding "ordinary maintenance:" "...We adopt today for California courts a rule of judicial… [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:30 pm
La Jolla Shores Clubdominium HOA (1999) 21 Cal.4th 249, 265; see also Dolan-King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:09 pm
La Jolla Shores Clubdominium Homeowners Assn. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 249 (“Lamden”) to the Board’s decision that the vineyard was not a prohibited use based “upon reasonable investigation, in good faith and with regard for the best interests of the community association and its members. [read post]
19 May 2020, 9:30 am
La Jolla Shores Clubdominium HOA (1999) 21 Cal.4th 249.) [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:07 am
La Jolla Shores Clubdominium Homeowner’s Assn. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 249.In Ekstrom, homeowners in a common interest development with beach and golf course views complained to the Board of Directors (“Board”) of the development’s homeowners association (“Association”) about palm trees that were growing higher than the rooftops and blocking those views. [read post]
