Search for: "Lamont v. Postmaster General"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
And of course AI companies already stress that they have instituted various guardrails that would avoid various outputs (again, however imperfectly); here's an example from OpenAI: Our use case guidelines, content guidelines, and internal detection and response infrastructure were initially oriented towards risks that we anticipated based on internal and external research, such as generation of misleading political content with GPT-3 or generation of malware with Codex. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 8:03 am
Postmaster General (1965), involved a law that barred the delivery of "communist propaganda" from foreign sources (which were understood as generally linked to foreign governments) unless the recipient affirmatively authorized its delivery. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Postmaster General (1965), involved a law that barred the delivery of “communist propaganda” from foreign sources (which were understood as generally linked to foreign governments) unless the recipient affirmatively authorized its delivery. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
Postmaster General, 381 U.S. 301, 307 (1965). [3] See, e.g., FedEx Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
See Lamont v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
Postmaster General. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am
Postmaster General, the first time the U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[15] Two years later, in Bigelow v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:19 am
The seminal case of Lamont v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
The Supreme Court has held (in Lamont v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:54 am
The Supreme Court has held (in Lamont v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:29 pm
Lamont v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:42 pm
That is why, for example, in Lamont v. [read post]
