Search for: "Lamp v. Lamp" Results 81 - 100 of 596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2007, 4:42 pm
Edison lost and as part of the settlement, Edison was forced to take Swan in as a partner in his British electric works.Moving to the year 2007, one wonders how Edison would have fared in the US with the new guidelines of KSR v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Krippelz v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Nimkoff v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:50 pm by Larry
The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The seventh is In re Lamps Plus Overtime Cases, no. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:36 pm by Larry
But, I have periodically looked for that lamp for Professor McGrath. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:34 pm
Patently-O has a May 2 post entitled: KSR v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ed. 221 (1895) ,It is admitted that the lamp described in the Sawyer and Man patent is no longer in use, and was never a commercial success; that it does not embody the principle of high resistance with a small illuminating surface; that it does not have the filament burner of the modern incandescent lamp; that the lamp chamber is defective, and that the lamp manufactured by the complainant and put upon the market is substantially the Edison lamp; but it… [read post]
23 May 2023, 2:37 pm by Holman
In another article, Amgen v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
It thus effectively overruled State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:54 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
(Wecht, J., Dissenting), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court addressed the Lamp v. [read post]