Search for: "Lancaster v. People"
Results 41 - 60
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2015, 12:20 pm
This would allow the developer to convey different parts of the project to different people. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:13 pm
, the circumstances under which coverage may lapse);(v) The employee's status as a key employee and the potential consequence that restoration may be denied following FMLA leave, explaining the conditions required for such denial (see§ 825.218);(vi) The employee's rights to maintenance of benefits during the FMLA leave and restoration to the same or an equivalent job upon return from FMLA leave (see§§ 825.214 and 825.604);… [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
Their petition to the Supreme Court in Sac and Fox Nation v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:19 pm
Junkins-Hopkins v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:41 am
Lancaster v County of Yolo (E.D. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
In Robinson Township v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
MayweatherTale of the Tape - PacMan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
I play a small role on that journal as Articles Review Editor, but credit must go out to Kevin Banks (and Bernie Adell (RIP), Jeffrey Sack and his people at Lancaster House, and Queens Law students who work on the journal. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, or agency, People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm
Oliver Brown fue un personaje secundario, un nombre más entre un grupo de casi doscientos reclamantes que habían sido seleccionados para litigar por la NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), una organización creada en 1909 para promover los derechos de los negros. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Lancaster Online. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm
However, the prosecution relied on the case of People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
(See Ford v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am
Perkins and Trevino v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
In summary, they raised the following points:Diminished capacity was first recognized as a defense in 1973 by People v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 10:02 am
Lancaster, in Clark v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In the 1964 case of Bouie v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:05 am
Lisa went with Officer Lynch to the Lancaster police station. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
Ideally that selection criteria should be objective and non-discriminatory as possible, although previous case law (Mitchells of Lancaster (Brewers)Ltd v Tattersall) has held that using non-objective criteria is not fatal to a redundancy selection exercise, provided the criteria is used fairly. [read post]
