Search for: "Lancaster v. People"
Results 61 - 80
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2013, 6:05 am
Lisa went with Officer Lynch to the Lancaster police station. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
Ideally that selection criteria should be objective and non-discriminatory as possible, although previous case law (Mitchells of Lancaster (Brewers)Ltd v Tattersall) has held that using non-objective criteria is not fatal to a redundancy selection exercise, provided the criteria is used fairly. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
“People seem to hate realizing losses. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am
I was likely not alone as the interest over National Federation of Independent Business, et al v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:14 am
Craig Russell is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:31 pm
The State of Nebraska v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:43 am
Misrepresentations to people in Grand Prairie, Fort Worth, Dallas, Duncanville, De Soto, Lancaster, Cedar Hill, and other places in Texas can be a reason to sue an insurance company when the misrepresentation causes harm. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:39 am
This case is a victory for people needing to sue an insurance company and its adjusters. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Lancaster v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Lancaster v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Mungo v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Shah v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 12:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:45 am
It has been used by several administrations, including in the George Fox 6 case at Lancaster in 2006. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
Lofts, Steve Lowry, Gregory V. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:13 am
The case is styled, Prodigy Communications Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Lancaster Jr., chair; Ralph Gillis, David Colson, Davis Robinson and Judge Stephen M. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
v=F_rTMNnxwSE [read post]
