Search for: "Lancaster v. People"
Results 81 - 100
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
v=F_rTMNnxwSE [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
v=F_rTMNnxwSE [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Whether The Duchy of Lancaster is a “public authority” for the purposes of the 2004 regs: Staffordshire County Council v IC EA/2010/0015. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
This issue came up in the case, American Home Assurance Company v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
V. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Click Here Pennsylvania Steel Beam and Concrete Manufacturers Settle Chemical Release Reporting Violations at Lancaster, Williamsport and Denver Plants. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
We have very bright people on our side. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:05 am
In many cases people will just throw the boxes away when they open the perfume, so why pay extra? [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:48 pm
He describes how the firm brought in lots of business-side people, including a CFO, a COO, and marketing and public relations people. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 1:34 am
“The reality is we’re pushing people to the brink. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
In Hussain v Lancaster CC [200] QB 1, it had been held that there was no duty of care owed by a landlord as regards the exercise of a discretionary power to seek possession. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:40 pm
Further, the Court cited Commonwealth v. [read post]
