Search for: "Landing v. Landing"
Results 61 - 80
of 21,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS (Case C-158/11); [2012] WLR (D) 175 “It had to be possible to verify the precise content of ‘specified criteria’ upon which a quantitative selective distribution system in the motor vehicle sector was granted pursuant to article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS (Case C-158/11); [2012] WLR (D) 175 “It had to be possible to verify the precise content of ‘specified criteria’ upon which a quantitative selective distribution system in the motor vehicle sector was granted pursuant to article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS (Case C-158/11); [2012] WLR (D) 175 “It had to be possible to verify the precise content of ‘specified criteria’ upon which a quantitative selective distribution system in the motor vehicle sector was granted pursuant to article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor… [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 10:39 am
On November 13, 2012, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted cert in Kilakila ‘O Haleakala v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm
There was much talk of easements, and limited fees, servitudes, and reversionary interests, but in the end it was far from clear what would guide the Court to a ruling in Marvin Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:59 am
Today's Honolulu Advertiser posts a story, "Bennett receives support on ceded lands," about the amicus brief of 29 states supporting Hawaii's request for US Supreme Court review of the "ceded lands" decision, Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:49 pm
In her state of the state address today, Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle had this to say about the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court's decision in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:47 am
Contracts — Breach — Nonperformance On September 19, 2011, appellant/cross-appellee, Maryland Land Consulting, LLC (MLC), and appellee/cross-appellant, Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge #1456 (Moose), entered into a contract for the sale of land located in Glen Burnie, Anne Arundel County. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:45 pm
I'm teaching Johnson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:05 am
In Tymoczko v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 7:15 pm
Administrative Procedures in Land Use Cases: In Citizens Against Reckless Development v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:35 pm
Part V examines the effects of the computerized systems on these doctrines. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 10:37 pm
” Harvard v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:34 am
Kücük v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen Case C-586/10; [2012] WLR (D) 11 “Clause 5(1)(a) of the framework agreement on fixed-term work, in the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, meant that a temporary need for replacement staff, provided for by national legislation could, in principle, constitute an objective reason under that clause for the renewal of successive… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:19 am
The Massachusetts Land Court recently decided an interesting legal issue regarding the impact of a judgment execution on joint tenancy ownership in McHugh v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
The current case is CIBC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:12 am
Corr v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:58 pm
In two earlier posts I explored the dangers that inhere in government advocacy in land use cases. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:33 am
Bureau of Land Management, held that the BLM violated the National Environmental Policy Act in its assessment of oil and gas leases on federal lands in California. [read post]
