Search for: "Lane v. Lane Processing" Results 201 - 220 of 653
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
The America Invents Act established a new post-grant adjudicatory process for challenging the validity of patents, called “covered business method” review. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Dave
In either case, the same or similar sensitive factual questions are likely to arise which the process of judicial review is not well adapted to determining, and which are better left to the County Court. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 2:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
From today's Florida Court of Appeals decision in Sewell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Hopefully, this legal error will be corrected during the formal rulemaking process. [read post]