Search for: "Lang v. Commissioner"
Results 21 - 40
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2021, 12:47 am
In the first judicial determination in the world of its type, the Australian Federal Court has held that artificial intelligence systems or devices can be “inventors” for the purpose of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) (Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In Lange v Atkinson [2000] 3 NZLR 385 the Court of Appeal criticized and declined to follow Reynolds, for the reason that they had altered “the structure of the law of qualified privilege in a way which adds to the uncertainty and chilling effect almost inevitably present in this area of the law”. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 4:31 am
The Full Court’s judgments are Commissioner of Patents v Ono Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am
On 20 December 2023, the UK Supreme Court handed down its highly anticipated judgment in the case of Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks [2023] UKSC 49, unanimously ruling that only a natural person can be named as an inventor on a patent application. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
The Privacy Commissioner of Canada has issued a report on the tension between privacy and data protection and cyber security. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm
10: ASIC guide on margin lending disclosure 09: Website record retention 08: ASIC consults on equity market review 08: Draft principles on open public sector information 02: Financial planners and tax agent registration 01: Contracting with Commonwealth government agencies October 2010 (23) 28: Inquiry into competition within the Australian banking sector 28: Telephone sales of general insurance products 28: Sex and Age Discrimination Legislation Amendment Bill 2010 … [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
International Trade Commissioner (moderator); Peggy Clarke, Powell Goldstein LLP"Queering International Law": Doris Buss, Carleton U.; Dianne Otto, U. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
Lang, C. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:36 am
An expanded five judge appeal bench of the Full Federal Court has recently handed down its judgment confirming that artificial intelligence (AI) systems or devices cannot be an “inventor” under the Patents Act 1990 (Commissioner of Patents v Thaler [2022] FCAFC 62), reversing the decision of Justice Beach at first instance and bringing Australia into line with the position taken in other jurisdictions including the US, UK and Europe. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:03 pm
”[6] What about Plessey v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Lang, for appellants-respondents Hochul et al. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Lang, for appellants-respondents Hochul et al. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:36 am
Alan Lange over at Y'all Politics has started a feature called Where Is Jim Hood? [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 12:23 am
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This led to the actual prorogation, which was as if the Commissioners had walked into Parliament with a blank piece of paper. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:38 am
The Victorian privacy commissioner argued that existing privacy laws are fragmented and inadequate to meet the privacy challenges faced by technological developments. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:45 am
Our last blog entry, UPC: four reasons on why the PPA is not legally in force, published on 21 April 2022, seems to have touched a nerve, as attested by the unprecedented number of comments received, for which this author is very grateful. [read post]
