Search for: "Lange v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Add to this the fact that the United States Patent and Trademark Office never requires the description to be adapted, yet patent enforcement obviously works there as well, and you may arrive at the conclusion that there is certainly no “business case” for the adaptation of a description if the claims are amended. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 8:02 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Teva Santé et al, No. 12/07203), while a few months later the Paris High Court rejected patentability for successive daily dosage units for administering the active ingredient desogestrel, on the grounds that this was a therapeutic method excluded from patentability (Paris High Court, 5 December 2014, Akzo Nobel NV et al. v. [read post]
In this case, Scandit argued that (unlike the 10x Genomics case) proceedings for the recognition and enforcement in the United States of America of a foreign damages award would result in considerable legal costs which, even if successful, would not have to be reimbursed by the debtor. [read post]
Co-authored by Dara Offrede The first Over-the-Counter Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) ever cleared in the United Stated by the FDA was launched by Dexcom. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Regulatory hegemony becomes important in that context, and hegemony for the purpose of preserving the solidity and position of States within complex clusters of human collectives may be served virtually through regulation platforms that serve as a united front. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:10 am by Hannah Rigby (Bristows)
This follows his earlier judgment in Teva v Novartis ([2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat)). [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:18 am by Roberto Rodrigues Pinho (RNA Law)
  Furthermore, the PDP Project proposal must now include information on “intellectual property, exclusivity contracts or commercial agreements, including details of any agreements or restrictions on licensing or 3rd-party access to the technology” (Annex CX, article 8, V). [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by George Croner
” While the Second Circuit noted in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
Though different in their details, these cases elucidate this issue from different perspectives:In January 2024, Rolex was successful in a US trade mark infringement case against BeckerTime before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
For the most part these trade disputes have been with the United States before NAFTA and Canada-U.S. [read post]