Search for: "Lanham v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 2,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 4:51 pm
The table sugar producers also pleaded facts that would support a joint-tortfeasor theory of liability by alleging that the association, at the direction of and in concert with several of its member companies, crafted a publicity campaign to revitalize and rebrand HFCS.The table sugar producers failed to state a claim against Roquette America by alleging only that a senior executive was a member of the CRA’s board of directors.The July 31, 2012, decision in Western Sugar Cooperative… [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 12:21 pm by randal shaheen
The Court, however, relied on its recent decision in Famous Horse Inc. v. 5th Ave. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:31 am by randal shaheen
A recent decision confirms a related principle: Lanham Act plaintiffs may not automatically tack on state consumer protection claims to their competitor cases. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:44 am by Bruce Colbath
Quaker State – Slick 50, Inc., 165 F.3d 221, 223-34 (3d Cir. 1998). [read post]