Search for: "Lanier v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
In any event, Egilman was probably not committed to the violent overthrow of the United States government because he had found a better way to destabilize our society by allying himself with the lawsuit industry. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 270-71 (1997), and, if only private individuals are charged, must be one that protects against private interference (rather than having a state-action element), see United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Applying those factors to the facts at hand, the court found a mixed bag: And here, CEM [the law firm] duly registered as a limited liability partnership with the Secretary of State. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
We join the officers and directors of the State Bar in expressing our deepest sympathy. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
The Ingham appellate decision this week from the Missouri Court of Appeals appears to be a superficial affirmation of the Lanier strategy.[2] The court gave defendants some relief on jurisdictional issues, but largely affirmed the admissibility of Lanier’s expert witnesses on medical causation, both general and specific.[3] After all, asbestos is an established cause of ovarian cancer. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm by Michael Froomkin
Today the 11th Circuit issued a per curiam decision on Kelvin Leon Jones, et al. v. [read post]