Search for: "Large v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, noted that the Court’s state action jurisprudence has largely focused upon “whether a nominally private person has engaged in state action,” not whether a state official had acted as a private citizen rather than a state actor. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
The Superior Court held that was a misapplication of Publicker and remanded the matter for a better record. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:24 am
This case began in Magistrate Court, before being heard in the High Court (the lowest level of superior courts in the Kenyan judiciary). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:07 am
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:49 pm
See Haynes v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:04 pm
The 55-page ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
California and Protect App-based Drivers, Alameda County Superior Ct. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Afflicted with a “culture of complacency[1],” the Ontario Superior Court has long struggled to timely advance cases to trial. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:14 am
The trial court found no standing and the Superior Court affirmed. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
He thought he had superior hard power, but underestimated Western unity and sanctions and relied too heavily on conscripts. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Dred Scott, The Civil Rights Cases, Lochner, Reynolds v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court also rejected the plaintiff’s reliance upon the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From last week's California Court of Appeal decision in Cusi v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:54 pm
In October, 2023, the federal court remanded the case to the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, Georgia. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
In Hameed v. [read post]
