Search for: "Large v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2021, 10:03 am
The Delaware Superior Court recently dismissed Jarden LLC’s bid for D&O insurance coverage for an appraisal suit that was not “for” redress of a “wrongful act” – and even if it was, the act couldn’t have occurred before the sale to Jewel Rubbermaid Inc. closed, ending the coverage period, in Jarden LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 4:37 pm
In Calvary Chapel San Jose v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:26 pm
Here's a "loophole" -- some would say, "scam" -- that I'm glad the Court of Appeal (largely) closed.It's a result of unambiguously good intentions. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Ritz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:01 pm
San Diego, while the ninth largest city in the nation, is not an especially large town when it comes to high-profile legal work. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:58 am
Superior Court, __ Cal.App. 4th __ (2010), concluding that a proposed class of employees governed by Wage Order 16 were entitled to premium meal period wages for second meal periods notwithstanding Division Four’s prior opinion in Bearden v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
Noe v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:16 pm
On Tuesday, June 5, 2007 the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in GENTRY v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Kraisinger v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:20 am
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:19 pm
Accordingly, I would allow the appeals in the manner indicated.See the Court's decision: Bhajan v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 11:45 am
" And, reading the Court of Appeal's opinion, you can totally see why. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
"It also appeared the occupants were hoarders, as there were large piles of items. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:06 am
Largely appropriate, in my view. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 9:48 am
" Citing Lindner v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 11:57 am
Compagnie d'arrimage de Québec ltée, 2023 QCCA 973 dismissed the appeal from a decision of the Quebec Superior Court that had rejected a class action on the merits seeking compensation in relation to the presence of large amounts of dust near the Port of Quebec.[1] The Court of Appeal’s decision is significant for two main reasons: (1) it reiterates the necessity of demonstrating a material contribution when proving causation in cases… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
In Moberg v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 9:00 pm
Superior Court significantly limits multistate class actions in federal courts. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:41 am
Earlier this month, the Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the earlier 2008 Quebec Superior Court decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 12:50 pm
The R. v. [read post]
