Search for: "Larkin Reynolds" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
They have an absolute right to believe anything they choose, per Reynolds v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Notwithstanding a quintet of relists since receiving the record, the Court denied cert. without comment in Larkin v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:26 am by Benjamin Wittes
As Bobby and Larkin Reynolds and I wrote in the introduction to our now-somewhat-dated paper on the Guantanamo cases: The law established in these cases will in all likelihood govern not merely the Guantánamo detentions themselves but any other detentions around the world over which American courts might acquire habeas jurisdiction—although, as we discuss briefly below, the prospects for wider habeas jurisdiction are unclear. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:28 am by Benjamin Wittes
The three big bubbles in the middle—that is, the people at the heart of Lawfare‘s network—represent Bobby (middle blue bubble), Jack (big blue bubble), and Larkin Reynolds (big orange bubble). [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 11:11 am by Benjamin Wittes
Number of page views it received: 61,499 Organic search term not including variants of “Lawfare,” “Guantanamo,” or “NDAA” that has generated the most Lawfare traffic: “Larkin Reynolds” Three names that do not appear in the top ten such search terms: Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, Robert Chesney. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 8:04 am by Benjamin Wittes
Number of page views it received: 61,499 Organic search term not including variants of “Lawfare,” “Guantanamo,” or “NDAA” that has generated the most Lawfare traffic: “Larkin Reynolds” Three names that do not appear in the top ten such search terms: Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, Robert Chesney, [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:26 am by Kali Borkoski
At the ABA, Rory Little has case summaries of the recent decisions in Jones, Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:22 pm by Benjamin Wittes
CHESNEY & LARKIN REYNOLDS, The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0: Guantanamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking, at 52-53 nn. 237-43 (May 12, 2011) (citing cases granting a presumption of authenticity but not accuracy), http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2011/05_guantanamo_wittes.aspx (last visited September 30, 2011). [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:58 am by Amanda Frost
Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, and Larkin Reynolds shed further light on these questions in their recent Brookings publication entitled The Emerging Law of Detention:  The Guantanamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking 2.0. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:14 am by Lawrence Solum
Benjamin Wittes (Brookings Institution-Governance Studies), Robert Chesney (University of Texas-Law), and Larkin Reynolds (Brookings Institution-Governance Studies) have posted The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0: The Guantanamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking on SSRN. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:19 pm by Benjamin Wittes
(By Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, and Larkin Reynolds) It is with great pleasure that we announce the second edition of the The Emerging Law of Detention: The Guantanamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian.  [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:19 am by Nabiha Syed
Obama, a case filed by five Chinese Uighurs held at Guantanamo Bay; at Lawfare, Larkin Reynolds provides excerpts from a supplemental brief recently filed by the petitioners in the case. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:35 pm by Robert Chesney
Fortunately, Larkin Reynolds was there today (along with quite a few of you), and will be posting a recap shortly. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:34 am by Benjamin Wittes
(By Benjamin Wittes and Larkin Reynolds) This summary is going to be short–short and obscure. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:39 pm by Benjamin Wittes
(By Benjamin Wittes and Larkin Reynolds) The D.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:37 am by Amanda Rice
At Lawfare, Larkin Reynolds notes that the Department of Justice has filed oppositions to four Guantanamo cert. petitions in the last week and highlights the governments’ framing of the questions presented in each case. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Kenneth Anderson
Update:  Larkin Reynolds at Lawfare offers a bunch of snippets from the opinion.   [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:44 am by Kenneth Anderson
Update:  Larkin Reynolds at Lawfare offers a bunch of snippets from the opinion; also at Lawfare, Bobby Chesney offers an objective outline, sans commentary, of the quite long opinion, and Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes weigh in with commentary.   [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:18 am by Benjamin Wittes
People who prefer to submit ideas confidentially can feel free to email them to Larkin Reynolds, who will post them with names scrubbed. [read post]