Search for: "Larry" Results 201 - 220 of 20,095
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by centerforartlaw
By Barbie Kim This article investigates copyright’s role in the afterlife of the photograph Tomoko and Mother in the Bath by American photojournalist W. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
00:49:27 LegalType: That’s what friends are for. 00:49:46 CJ Webster: Such great stories. 00:52:06 Richard DiBona: you need to say “616 you’re on the air” like Larry King 00:55:26 gretchen desutter: Check out JB’s books on Dylan, Led Zeppelin and Prince. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:40 am by Mario Zúñiga
In order to promote competition in digital markets,[1] Latin American countries should not copy and paste “solutions” from other jurisdictions, but rather design their own set of policies. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Paul Cassell
In brief, we examine the 168 victim impact statements (VISs) presented at the sentencing of Larry Nassar for sex abuse. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
He admitted that he was able to find only one lawyer — Harvard Professor Larry Tribe — who told him that he could do it. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by David Bernstein
Larry Solum's legal blog says its "highly recommended," and you can download it here. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
Most modern originalists, as I show below, agree with this method of constitutional interpretation.Professor Larry Solum is a leading academic originalist of the last 25 years. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 5:56 pm
It played a key role in the Chinese analysis of what went wrong in Hong Kong during the 2019-2020 crisis (Larry Catá Backer, Hong Kong Between One Country and Two Systems (2021), chapter 7)). [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 2:12 pm by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
The 24-hour news cycle is brutal even on the Election Law Blog, so I want to use the relative quiet of the weekend to re-surface those articles that I “highly recommend”–to borrow Larry Solum’s phrase. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:00 am by Eric Segall
Two examples are Professor Larry Tribe, who thinks Trump is disqualified, and Professor Stephen Calabresi, one of the co-founders of the Federalist Society, who first agreed with Tribe but has since changed his mind and thinks Trump can't be disqualified because, among other reasons, the presidency is not covered by Section 3.And, finally (at least for now), enter another leading expert on the history of the 14th Amendment, Professor Kurt Lash. [read post]