Search for: "Latham v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Dubofsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, February 29, 2024 Tags: Activism, ESG, Proxy advisors, Shareholder activism BlackRock Updated 2024 U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Dubofsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, February 29, 2024 Tags: Activism, ESG, Proxy advisors, Shareholder activism BlackRock Updated 2024 U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 10:03 am
She worked as an associate at Latham & Watkins LLP in San Diego starting in 1997 and became an equity partner in 2006. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
The Federal Court would make legal history in the defamation battle between Sydney MP Alex Greenwich and former NSW One Nation leader Mark Latham if it empanelled a jury to hear the case, the Sydney Morning Herald reports. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am by Norman L. Eisen
Jeffrey Clark (1:23-cv-03721) (civil removal proceedings) GA (Latham): The State of Georgia v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Maursky v Latham 2023 NY Slip Op 04115 Decided on August 2, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department seems to be a fair decision, yet doesn’t really say why the court reversed the grant of dismissal. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 4:40 am by jonathanturley
Jackson also prevailed on counts under the Latham Act for false endorsement (Count III) and false advertising (Count IV), conversion (Count V), and unjust enrichment (Count VI). [read post]