Search for: "Latimer v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 11:08 am
Latimer argues that the trial court erred when it (1) failed to conduct the proper evidentiary analysis and failed to explain its decision; (2) refused to allow Latimer to obtain a statement relevant to the proceedings; and (3) refused to [...] [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:39 am
Latimer argues that the trial court erred when it (1) failed to conduct the proper evidentiary analysis and failed to explain its decision; (2) refused to allow Latimer to obtain a statement relevant to the proceedings; and (3) refused to [...] [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:42 am
Criminal procedure — Waiver of right to counsel — Misstatement by judge Appellant Anthony Leon Latimer represented himself at a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Washington County. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:07 am
United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951). [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:34 am
Forgetting Payton v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:55 am
Indeed, the Latimer House Principles have also been cited and relied on by the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and its High Court Division [e.g. in Government of Bangladesh v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:20 pm
Latimer v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Latimer, and Christopher Johnson appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Katherine A. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Latimer, and Christopher Johnson appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Katherine A. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Latimer, and Christopher Johnson appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Katherine A. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Latimer, and Christopher Johnson appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Katherine A. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:14 am
A convoluted copyright infringement case that was decided earlier this month – Latimer v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 11:45 am
Merck & Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 4:54 am
Patent problems in patent law - pdf (see this earlier post) THE PATENT SYSTEM in the United States is so dysfunctional that it can even generate sympathy for Microsoft. […] The purpose of patents, like copyrights, is to promote innovation by giving inventors exclusive rights to use and distribute their creations for a limited time. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm
Kevin Drum discusses this LATimes article on the American Needle v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 8:45 am
[LATimes] Speaking of, here's the future case of Allred v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 9:56 am
Can you imagine if Loving v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
LATimes 6/19/08 [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:50 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Latimer, Mr. [read post]