Search for: "Laurent Teyssèdre" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 3:19 pm by Armand Grinstajn
I owe the knowledge of this decision to Laurent Teyssèdre, who has discussed it on his blog (in French). [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 3:27 pm by Armand Grinstajn
I owe the knowledge of this decision, which had escaped my scrutiny, to Laurent Teyssèdre, who has discussed the various admissibility issues addressed by the Board in a recent post on his blog. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm by or
My thanks also go to Laurent Teyssèdre, the father of EPC case law blogging, whose blog was quite an inspiration to me.All the bestoliverBoard deliberation (in a composition pursuant to A 21(4)(a) EPC) [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
  To read the whole decision, click here.NB: This decision has also been commented by Laurent Teyssèdre. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the [opponent] in any case had to file an appeal so that the reimbursement of the appeal fee, which was not requested, is not equitable.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.To have a look at the file wrapper, click here.This decision was also reported on Laurent Teyssèdre’s blog. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
 NB: This decision has also been commented by Laurent Teyssèdre on his blog. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here.A French summary has been made available to the public by Laurent Teyssèdre (here). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
 The impugned decision can be found here, the file wrapper here.NB: Laurent Teyssèdre has commented this decision here. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here.NB: This appeal was won by fellow blogger Laurent Teyssèdre. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
NB: This decision is also commented on Laurent Teyssèdre’s blog. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 10:26 am by Armand Grinstajn
This decision has already been commented (in French) by Laurent Teyssèdre on his blog. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here.A nice summary in French can be found on Laurent Teyssèdres’s blog.In conclusion, Laurent offers good advice: “Be careful not to forget to file an appropriate description together with each request when you intend not to attend the OPs. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
NB: Laurent Teyssèdre was probably the first to report this decision; you can find his post here. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
But this experiment came to a sudden end when Laurent Teyssèdre, to whose popular blog Armand had made some minor contributions, discovered the existence of K’s Law and informed his readers. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A translation will be published in the Official Journal of the EPO.NB: Once again my fellow bloggers Laurent Teyssèdre and Mark Schweizer have been faster than lightning in reporting this decision. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
To read the whole decision, click here.NB: This decision has already been reported on Laurent Teyssèdre’s blog. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
To download the whole decision (in French), click here.The file wrapper is found here.NB: Laurent Teyssèdre also comments this decision (here). [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to downlaod the whole decision, just click here.NB: This decision has already been reported on Laurent Teyssèdre’s blog. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.NB: Laurent Teyssèdre was the first to report this decision; to read his post, click here. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This examination appeal would have gone unnoticed by me if Laurent Teyssèdre had not discussed it on his blog (here).The Examining Division (ED) had refused the application on July 7, 2011.In principle the time limit for filing an appeal expired on September 19, 2011.The appeal was filed on September 20.The appellant filed a statement of grounds of appeal as well as an auxiliary request for re-establishment.The core argument of the appellant was that the… [read post]