Search for: "Laurent Teyssèdre" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2021, 2:41 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
  List of signatories Jean-Michel Bruguière, Professor at the University of Grenoble-Alpes, Anne-Catherine Chiariny, Associate Professor at the University of Montpellier, Jean-Pierre Clavier, Professor of private law at the University of Nantes, Director of the Master in Intellectual Property Law, Matthieu Dhenne, Attorney-at-Law at the Paris Bar, President of de Boufflers Institute, Charles de Haas, Attorney-at-Law at the Paris Bar, Jean-Christophe Galloux, Professor at the… [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm by or
My thanks also go to Laurent Teyssèdre, the father of EPC case law blogging, whose blog was quite an inspiration to me.All the bestoliverBoard deliberation (in a composition pursuant to A 21(4)(a) EPC) [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This examination appeal would have gone unnoticed by me if Laurent Teyssèdre had not discussed it on his blog (here).The Examining Division (ED) had refused the application on July 7, 2011.In principle the time limit for filing an appeal expired on September 19, 2011.The appeal was filed on September 20.The appellant filed a statement of grounds of appeal as well as an auxiliary request for re-establishment.The core argument of the appellant was that the… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here.Great minds think alike; Laurent Teyssèdre has commented this decision on the very same day (here). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here.NB: This appeal was won by fellow blogger Laurent Teyssèdre. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here.A French summary has been made available to the public by Laurent Teyssèdre (here). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here.A nice summary in French can be found on Laurent Teyssèdres’s blog.In conclusion, Laurent offers good advice: “Be careful not to forget to file an appropriate description together with each request when you intend not to attend the OPs. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The appeal fee is to be reimbursed.Should you wish to download the whole decision, click here.The file wrapper can be found here.NB: There is a post on this decision on Laurent Teyssèdre’s blog. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
 The impugned decision can be found here, the file wrapper here.NB: Laurent Teyssèdre has commented this decision here. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Not long ago, I have reported two cases (here and here) where the Board found auxiliary requests inadmissible because they could have been filed or were withdrawn after having been filed before the Opposition Division (OD). [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
To download the whole decision (in French), click here.The file wrapper is found here.NB: Laurent Teyssèdre also comments this decision (here). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the [opponent] in any case had to file an appeal so that the reimbursement of the appeal fee, which was not requested, is not equitable.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.To have a look at the file wrapper, click here.This decision was also reported on Laurent Teyssèdre’s blog. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
The present decision deals with an appeal against the decision of the opposition division (OD) to revoke a European patent owned by a Spanish company. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.NB: Laurent Teyssèdre was the first to report this decision; to read his post, click here. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Claim 1 as granted read:Use of organic fibres having a melting point smaller than 300°C, an average length 1 greater than 1 mm and a diameter Ø not exceeding 200 ? [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The Enlarged Board of appeal (EBA) has spoken again! [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Most readers of this blog are certainly aware of the fact that petitions for review hardly ever succeed. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to downlaod the whole decision, just click here.NB: This decision has already been reported on Laurent Teyssèdre’s blog. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
But this experiment came to a sudden end when Laurent Teyssèdre, to whose popular blog Armand had made some minor contributions, discovered the existence of K’s Law and informed his readers. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present decision is in no way spectacular but it presents in a very pedagogical manner how inventive step is nowadays assessed by the Boards in the chemical realm:Novelty of the subject-matter having been acknowledged, the assessment of inventive step begins with the search for the closest prior art.The closest prior art[4.1] The closest state of the art is normally a prior art document disclosing subject-matter with the same objectives as the claimed invention and having the most relevant… [read post]