Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 1 - 20
of 16,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2024, 6:22 am
FanFirm commenced proceedings against Fanatics for:Trade mark infringement;Rectification of the Register through cancellation of Fanatics’ trade mark registrations;Misleading and deceptive conduct in breach of the Australian Consumer Law; andPassing off,while Fanatics cross-claimed with the same allegations against FanFirm.Justice Helen Rofe oversaw the proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia, issuing her decision on 17 July 2024. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
From Doe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm
The Importance of Carpenter v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 12:31 pm
Winter v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 12:31 pm
Winter v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 12:31 pm
Winter v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The ensuing investigation excluded any violation of US customs law. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:09 am
The trial judge uses something called the Daubert standard (in reference to a case called Daubert v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 8:42 am
Shen v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 8:42 am
From Doe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 8:42 am
“Employee of the German Red Cross Sentenced to Death in Belarus. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 8:42 am
“Employee of the German Red Cross Sentenced to Death in Belarus. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:26 am
Missouri v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In a 6-3 decision in Garland v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 5:57 am
If the real risk test, as applied in El Haski v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
This year, Bissonnette v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm
Del.) in Jankowicz v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:13 am
” J.R. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 9:04 am
The case is entitled Johnson et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:22 am
By: Rachel V. [read post]