Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 1 - 20
of 16,543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm
Some background for the motion to keep defendant in jail pending trial (U.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:48 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am
State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Tribal Contract Health; Discovery) United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:02 am
According to Valencia v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Fifty trucks carrying humanitarian aid entered Gaza through the Rafah crossing yesterday, including two trucks specifically carrying fuel, according to an Egyptian official. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
The case has an obvious cross-border flavour. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm
R (UNISON) v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm
But in the context of anti-suit or anti-enforcement injunctions, it is impossible to shoehorn the cross-border implications of the relief into a hypothetical proceeding that is purely domestic. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm
In view of the apparent contradictions caused by a growing number of complex cross-cutting, cross-boundary and cross-cultural phenomena, such as artificial intelligence, climate change or zoonotic diseases, the time may have come again to rethink and transcend the dualisms that guided human thinking for a long time creating wide gaps between not only law and law, but also between law and other scientific areas? [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
For instance, we know he grew up in Bristol, England and got involved in the underground street art there in the 1990s.[1] In an effort to evade the police, the artist began going by a pseudonym, first going by Robin Banx, later shortening it to Banksy (this was easier to write quickly on a wall).[2] When he was 18, he realized stencils were a faster method that would allow him to make a quick getaway from law enforcement. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am
There will no doubt be Jewish men who will not be able to wear their skullcaps and a few Christians of both sexes who will not be able to wear a cross in their lapels, but they will be a small minority – the overwhelming number of those affected will be female Muslims. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
Raich—(a terrible federalism decision holding that Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce authorizes a ban on the possession of marijuana that never crossed state lines or was sold in any commercial transaction)—and Kelo v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:30 pm
The post Case Review – Darwin Construction (BC) Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 3:06 pm
The post Calistoga Ranch Owner, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:53 pm
That is precisely what happened in Calistoga Ranch Owner, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:25 pm
No, said the Florida Supreme Court today in City of Tallahassee v. [read post]
