Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 181 - 200
of 15,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2020, 10:13 am
Citing Adams v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:44 pm
Supreme Court heard argument for the second time in the case of Hernandez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Sometimes the case law suggests th [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:40 am
The US Supreme Court today issued a new ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 5:09 am
The Sixth Circuit’s decision in Doe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:31 pm
Tax law — Hotel rental taxes — Refundability Appellee/cross-appellant Lockheed Martin sought a refund of the hotel rental taxes it paid over the course of three years to appellant/cross-appellee Montgomery County in connection with a facility at its corporate headquarters that offers sleeping accommodations to employees and guests who pay for overnight stays. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 12:35 pm
Supreme Court; and Theodore V. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:30 am
iStock_000000114540_1.jpg In child pornography prosecution, in the absence of any showing that the officers had a direct or personal financial interest in the result of the case, the trial court properly excluded cross-examinationthat the Sheriff's Office would receive about 25 percent of the proceeds resulting from the forfeiture of the defendant's home, in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
As the Court said in citing past cases, “These cases stand for the unremarkable proposition that law enforcement witnesses should be treated in the same manner as any other prosecution witness for purposes of cross-examination. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:50 pm
In the battle of “piracy” v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:52 am
Glover v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 11:56 am
& N.J. in 2002, Outar v City of New York in 2001/2005. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
The Supreme Court endorsed such a test in a case called Boumediene v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:40 am
Criminal law — Limits on cross-examination — Sufficiency of evidence In May 2022, the State charged Alfonso A. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:12 am
Co-author Emily Morris * One of the questions raised in 1776 Energy Partners, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:36 pm
The post Afternoon round-up: The American Legion v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:58 pm
In the matter of Marangos v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:18 am
The aim of the procedural initiative is to clarify the administrative procedure that applies in cross-border investigations and enforcement under the GDPR. [read post]
