Search for: "Law v. Cross" Results 181 - 200 of 16,431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm by Aaron Moss
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am by Jonathan H. Adler
That also explains why it bans procedures that administer cross-sex hormones but not those that administer naturally occurring hormones. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 10:44 pm
Full report: Bailii.AB v CD [2023] EWFC 103 (18 May 2023)Third judgment in cross-applications to vary a periodical payments order in respect of severely disabled adult child of the marriage. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Klein Distinguished Scholar Chair, University of Miami School of Law)“Social Media and the Weaponization of Free Speech”Expert Statement  Michael German (Fellow, Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law)“Why the FBI Failed to Anticipate Violence at the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:03 am by Larry
Third party audits are of varying quality and not always possible given local laws. [read post]
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:26 am by Ekaterina Pannebakker
It employs workers of different nationalities who carry out cross-border work in various EU countries. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss the complaint is granted, and the cross-motion is denied. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:53 am by Unknown
The Court also declined to hear a cross-petition by Jarkesy arguing that circuit courts lacked jurisdiction to remand his case back to the Commission (Jarkesy v. [read post]