Search for: "Law v. Cross" Results 201 - 220 of 16,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Godfrey, The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Federal Prison Officials, and the Doctrinal Dinosaur of Qualified Immunity, (New York University Law Review, forthcoming).Amanda Reid, Roadside Memorial Crosses: Highway to Healing or Crossroads of Conflict, (in Equal Protection v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am by Giles Peaker
The facts of Peter Schmidt, about a winding up petition, and JK v MK, about a consensual divorce, were very different from those in the present case. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 7:48 am by Russell Knight
The deponent may be questioned by any party as if under cross-examination. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Seq. 001 “) Plaintiff cross-moved seeking to compel Defendant to respond to certain discovery demands (NYSCEF Doc. 11 ). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:40 pm by Bryan West
In response, Nova brought a cross-motion asking the Court to restore the action to the trial list. [read post]
The Legal 500 United States, a premier list of the country’s best law firms, also commended McGuireWoods for the “exceptional quality” of its powerhouse white collar litigation practice. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Pettkus v Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834 is perhaps the most well-known family law example of the tragic consequences of ignoring a survivor’s experience.[1] Less well-known, are the cases developing the law governing domestic contracts. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am by Alan J. Arville
Where the issuance of a prescription is otherwise consistent with applicable federal and state laws, the proposed rules would allow practitioners to: Prescribe up to a 30-day supply of Schedule III-V non-narcotic controlled medications, Prescribe up to an initial 30-day supply of buprenorphine for the induction of treatment of opioid use disorder, and Prescribe any schedule of controlled medication, including narcotics, where there has been a qualifying telemedicine… [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
Noting a “dearth of Maryland law that touches on the de facto dividend claim,” the opinion embarked on a detailed examination of the federal tax code and regulations concerning constructive dividends, followed by a cross-country tour of decisions from five state and three federal courts. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by SHG
When the prosecutor Blaine Ramsey was cross-examined, he was asked about the stains on the shorts. [read post]