Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 201 - 220
of 16,696
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2024, 1:45 pm
Read the opinion The post ROBERT LEE MOORE, JR. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, January 26, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 19-25, 2024 Mergers and Acquisitions—2024 Posted by Victor Goldfeld, Mark Stagliano, and Mark Andriola, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 19, 2024 Tags: Acquisition, Activism, Antitrust, Cross-border transactions, Energy, Healthcare, M&A,… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, January 26, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 19-25, 2024 Mergers and Acquisitions—2024 Posted by Victor Goldfeld, Mark Stagliano, and Mark Andriola, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 19, 2024 Tags: Acquisition, Activism, Antitrust, Cross-border transactions, Energy, Healthcare, M&A,… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:24 am
International Court of Justice Issues Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:15 am
Bean LJ strongly dissented, describing as trite law that, in general, a party is required to challenge on cross-examination the evidence of any witness of the opposing party it wishes to submit to the court that that evidence should not be accepted. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:29 pm
The jurisdictional threshold which the applicant has to cross is, accordingly, set quite low and any ruling — whether as to law or fact — which the Court makes at the provisional measures stage of a case is necessarily provisional. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Law students can thank the former President for Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm
" Arizona v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:19 am
centras V? [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am
With regard to his status as a campaigner against Pride and the use of the Pride and Progress Pride flag, the Acting Chancellor referred to his original decision in which he took the relevant law on the question of standing from Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44. at [92] and [94]. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:14 am
Morgan Washington State’s Proposed Employer Social Media Law: The Legislature Should Take a Cautious Approach — SB 5211 Big Problems in California’s New Law Restricting Employers’ Access to Employees’ Online Accounts (Forbes Cross-Post) “Social Media and Trademark Law” Talk Notes Court Denies Kravitz’s Motion to Dismiss PhoneDog’s Amended Claims — PhoneDog v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:35 am
In Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
It is right and proper that Israel is answering these charges in a court of law. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 5:07 am
See id.; State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am
The Court of Appeals of Washington examined this issue in State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 7:26 pm
Presently on the emergency docket, Department of Homeland Security et al. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
In Sisvel International S.A. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:28 am
Wojcik Law Firm, P.C. v Mull 2024 NY Slip Op 00060 Decided on January 09, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department is a legal fee claim with a guarantee twist. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]