Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 21 - 40
of 16,463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2023, 1:15 pm
New York Supreme Court Justice Thomas Marcelle ruled Monday in the case Cuomo v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:19 am
” And in State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
And earlier this year, in the similarly no-chance Doe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
However, it concluded that “Dr Scott’s actions did not cross the high threshold required to be considered serious misconduct”. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 6:52 am
See Backpage.com v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
In S.B.B. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 4:03 am
Davenport v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 3:30 am
Eboni Nelson One would be hard pressed to find a law school graduate in the past half century who was not aware of the Williams v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 12:28 pm
More broadly, Bruen instructed lower courts to decide Second Amendment cases the way that Court had decided District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 7:58 am
Criminal law — Cross-examination — Sufficiency of evidence A jury, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, convicted Derrick Wills, appellant, of one count of first-degree murder, one count of attempted first-degree murder, two counts of robbery with a dangerous weapon, one count of home invasion, two counts of use of a firearm in […] The post DERRICK TIMOTHY WILLS v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
For example, in DeHoog v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
Second, courts also held that “[t]o be entitled to an equitable accounting, a claimant must demonstrate that he or she has no adequate remedy at law” (Unitel Telecard Distribution Corp. v Nunez, 90 AD 3d 568 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:06 am
FRAND is an emerging area of law, and, in addition to the ratios, the obiter comments from the Judge could be of equal value. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
’[9] Likewise, in EW, Hickinbottom J suggested that ‘in the ordinary course the [Article 3] threshold may be crossed if, as a result of a withdrawal of support…a person was obliged to sleep in the street, or was seriously hungry, or was unable to meet the most basic requirements of hygiene. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:00 pm
In some countries, trade secrets were protected as an IP right under specific legislation, in others protection stemmed solely from case-law and in yet others such information was protected under competition law. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 31 July 2023, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) refused permission to appeal against the sentences of two Just Stop Oil protestors who scaled the bridge at the Dartford crossing, R. v Trowland & Anor [2023] EWCA Crim 919. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
