Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 41 - 60
of 16,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am
The 4th Circuit majority shoehorned the three-pronged test from Lemon v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:52 am
Bolsover District Council v Dennis Rye Ltd Court of Appeal “A judge hearing a winding-up petition against a company, when faced with a cross-claim by the company against the petitioner, had to consider only whether the evidence before him was sufficient to satisfy him that the company's cross-claim was not merely arguable but was genuine and serious, [...] [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 5:30 pm
Recently, in the Mergers, Acquisitions, and Split-Ups course here at Harvard Law School, which is co-taught by Professor Robert Clark and Vice Chancellor Leo Strine, Jr., three expert practitioners shared their insights on the complex cross-border transactions that increasingly define the M&A landscape. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In Wade v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:05 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The Court has granted certiorari in Maryland-Capital Park and Planning Commission v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:24 pm
In yesterday's decision of AAA Blueprint v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:06 pm
The Maryland legislature could enact new laws to require removal of the cross or transfer of the land. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 2:01 am
Rubin and another v Eurofinance SAand others [2009] WLR (D) 282 “The Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006, which gave effect to the UNCITRAL Model Law relating to cross-border insolvency, applied where the foreign bankruptcy proceedings related to a debtor which, according to English law, had no legal personality either as an individual or as a body corporate. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law Emeritus at The George Washington University Law School. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:49 am
Eweida v British Airways plc Court of Appeal “Because it was not a requirement of Christianity that adherents had to wear a public display of their faith, it was not indirect discrimination for an employer’s dress code to prevent a staff member from wearing a cross as a visible neck adornment. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:17 pm
Steward Health v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:40 pm
Long v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
In Mellouli v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 9:18 am
Worsham”), appellant/cross-appellee, as well as his law firm, Michael ... [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 9:06 am
In the case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:45 am
Here are the materials: DCT Order on Cross Motions Wyandotte Motion for Summary J Interior Opposition Kansas Opposition An excerpt: Plaintiff Wyandotte Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe (“the Nation”), filed this lawsuit against Kenneth Salazar, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior (“the Secretary”), seeking an order from this Court compelling the Secretary to accept title to certain land and hold it in trust for the Nation’s… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:45 am
(Cross-posted at PrawfsBlawg) In Chimel v. [read post]
