Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 41 - 60
of 14,977
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2007, 7:42 pm
The panelists included Richard Hall of Cravath, Swaine & Moore along with Scott V. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:52 am
Bolsover District Council v Dennis Rye Ltd Court of Appeal “A judge hearing a winding-up petition against a company, when faced with a cross-claim by the company against the petitioner, had to consider only whether the evidence before him was sufficient to satisfy him that the company's cross-claim was not merely arguable but was genuine and serious, [...] [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:04 am
In one case, People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am
The 4th Circuit majority shoehorned the three-pronged test from Lemon v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 5:30 pm
Recently, in the Mergers, Acquisitions, and Split-Ups course here at Harvard Law School, which is co-taught by Professor Robert Clark and Vice Chancellor Leo Strine, Jr., three expert practitioners shared their insights on the complex cross-border transactions that increasingly define the M&A landscape. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In Wade v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:05 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The Court has granted certiorari in Maryland-Capital Park and Planning Commission v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:06 pm
The Maryland legislature could enact new laws to require removal of the cross or transfer of the land. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:24 pm
In yesterday's decision of AAA Blueprint v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 2:01 am
Rubin and another v Eurofinance SAand others [2009] WLR (D) 282 “The Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006, which gave effect to the UNCITRAL Model Law relating to cross-border insolvency, applied where the foreign bankruptcy proceedings related to a debtor which, according to English law, had no legal personality either as an individual or as a body corporate. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:49 am
Eweida v British Airways plc Court of Appeal “Because it was not a requirement of Christianity that adherents had to wear a public display of their faith, it was not indirect discrimination for an employer’s dress code to prevent a staff member from wearing a cross as a visible neck adornment. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law Emeritus at The George Washington University Law School. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:17 pm
Steward Health v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:40 pm
Long v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
In Mellouli v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 9:18 am
Worsham”), appellant/cross-appellee, as well as his law firm, Michael ... [read post]
