Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 161 - 180
of 14,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2025, 7:05 am
In Edward M.R. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am
Law 360 have more information. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 3:21 pm
McCormack v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 12:30 pm
And in a recent case—United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Employee then retained her own counsel and initiated a cross-claim against the City pursuant to General Municipal Law §50-k seeking, among other things, to recover attorneys' fees and costs she incurred in her defense in Plaintiff's action.In response City filed a motion for summary judgment dismissing Employee's cross-claim seeking fees and costs incurred in her defense of Plaintiff's action. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Employee then retained her own counsel and initiated a cross-claim against the City pursuant to General Municipal Law §50-k seeking, among other things, to recover attorneys' fees and costs she incurred in her defense in Plaintiff's action.In response City filed a motion for summary judgment dismissing Employee's cross-claim seeking fees and costs incurred in her defense of Plaintiff's action. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
v=4OXIu_mGgK8. [3] Id. [4] Robin Blumenthal, Inside the love-hate relationship between banks and private credit, Private Debt Investor ( [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 5:08 am
The School was refused permission to cross-appeal [7]. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 1:03 pm
It goes further, actually — the Judiciary, after Marbury v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 4:05 pm
In its judgment of 15 March 2022 in the case of OOO Memo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 3:10 am
We will introduce settled case law and discuss recent decisions. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm
One could argue that the spirit of the double jeopardy rule should apply here even if the letter of the law does not. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 9:03 am
” The judge concluded that “any finding of similarity in the end requires the exercise of common sense and requires the hearing officer to stand back and consider the overall question”.I can’t find this case online for free – only the cost judgment appears available – so you’ll need to turn to your favourite subscription case law database to read it in full.2. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 8:42 am
Doe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 1:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 8:24 am
This Kat is pleased to host the following guest contribution from Katfriend Lilliana Swainson (student in the Faculty of Law, Bond University) to provide a summary of the recent Australian case on the subject of copycat products, Hampton Holdings IP Pty Ltd v Aldi Foods Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1452. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 6:03 am
But I think federal government pressure aimed at getting such intermediaries to restrict speech does violate the Constitution (see NRA v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 6:03 am
See Yelling v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 5:01 am
Holder v. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
With many funds nearing the ends of their life cycles, there continues to be much focus on diverse exit routes, such as cross-fund deals, continuation funds, minority deals and co-control deals, and limited partners have continued to be active in the secondary market. [read post]
