Search for: "Law v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 173,559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Thomas v Garden City Park Water/Fire Dist. 2024 NY Slip Op 03759 Decided on July 10, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Thomas v Garden City Park Water/Fire Dist. 2024 NY Slip Op 03759 Decided on July 10, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:48 am by Benson Varghese
Courts evaluate various factors to ensure the child’s well-being, as outlined in the landmark case Holley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:48 am by Benson Varghese
Courts evaluate various factors to ensure the child’s well-being, as outlined in the landmark case Holley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:48 am by Benson Varghese
Courts evaluate various factors to ensure the child’s well-being, as outlined in the landmark case Holley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:31 am by Josh Blackman
The Dean of a law faculty explained that they create a special "bootcamp" program for Arab students to help them prepare for, and adjust to, a law program in Hebrew. [read post]
For example, in the case of pharmaceutical products, the current law in some contracting member states suggests that the trigger for a PI may be marketing activities, an application for (or the grant of) pricing and/or reimbursement, or even the grant of a marketing authorisation. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:44 pm by Unknown
(Intergovernmental Agreement; State Court Removal; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Steve v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Attorney or Special Counsel is almost surely at most an "inferior officer," as the Supreme Court held with respect to the Independent Counsel in 1988 in Morrison v. [read post]
Regarding US history, the court rejected the state’s argument that 18 to 20-year-olds were denied the right to bear arms under common law. [read post]