Search for: "Law v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 172,191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 am by Orin S. Kerr
Under New York law, you need to register businesses with the state. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:29 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
” The Flexible Standards for Judicial Removal For business divorce practitioners, we are often forced to divine the current state of the law, and to formulate arguments based upon that understanding, from just a few short sentences in a handful of relevant cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 9:54 am by Giles Peaker
But even if there was, the council had evidenced that the policy was a proportionate means of achieving its stated aim. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am by Chukwuma Okoli
However, challenges arise when parties fail to expressly state the applicable law, leading to a strict standard for implying the choice of law based on a number of factors. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Modern originalists are leapfrogging over the Taft era to resurrect an older, anti-Federalist tradition of strict construction and textualism that dates back to Spencer Roane and John Taylor’s response to McCulloch v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Union County Board of County Commissioners is hosting Gibbons v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That would violate the prohibition against marital status discrimination under state law. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 1:09 pm by Stephen J. Natoli
In a landmark decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court provided critical insights into the state’s witness tampering statute through the case of State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm by Evan Brown
What does the proposed law actually say? [read post]