Search for: "Law v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 156,587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2025, 9:51 am by Anne Perry and Katie Calogero
Similarly, while inconsistent state laws likely will fall prey to the Preemption Doctrine (the general rule that federal laws trump inconsistent state laws), state laws that are not inconsistent with the EOs likely remain operative, and contractors will be held accountable for compliance with those laws. [read post]
In particular, the Executive Orders direct government contracts and grant agreements to include: A term requiring the contractual counterparty or grant recipient to agree that its compliance in all respects with all applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws is material to the government’s payment decisions for purposes of section 3729(b)(4) of tile 31, United States Code [the FCA]; and A term requiring such counterparty or recipient to certify that it does not operate… [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 9:41 am by Josh Blackman
 To put it another way, such a reading of § 706 would obviate Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 8:16 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Right of confrontation — Sentencing After a trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, the jury found Charles Edward Kelly, Jr., appellant, guilty of first-degree […] [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 8:09 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Speedy trial — Instant indictment Following a three-day jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, the Appellant, Brian Taylor (“Taylor”) was convicted of first-degree […] [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 7:58 am by Jonathan Zasloff
Under current law, it isn’t clear at all what precisely CEQA even means under current law. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 7:25 am by Holly
§ 1052. [3] Gilson LaLonde, Far from Fluent, supra note 1 at 789. [4] Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 7:00 am by Ilya Somin
Consent in Dred Scott Written by a slaveholder and joined by five other slaveholders, Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services [DCA] denied Petitioners' FOIL requests for records pursuant to New York State's Freedom of Information Law, Public Officers Law §§84-90, seeking "[a] list containing the name, race, gender, current salary, current job title, city start date, salary on city start date, [and] title start date, of all employees of" several City agencies over a period of 10 years. [read post]