Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 168,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2007, 2:21 am
Court can hear appeal on jurisdiction point Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:26 am
Nor will allowing state courts to resolve these cases undermine “the develop- ment of a uniform body of [patent] law. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:40 pm
Caren Myers Morrison (Georgia State University - College of Law) has posted The Drug Dealer, the Narc, and the Very Tiny Constable: Reflections on United States v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 5:42 am
On today’s episode, Nathan Earwood joins the NC DWI Guy to discuss the practical application and utilization of State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:30 pm
Lopatka, Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law have an interesting paper on Parker v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:02 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 2:07 am
Continued detention of failed asylum-seeker is lawful Regina (A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “The continued detention, pending deportation, of a failed asylum-seeker after the end of a term of imprisonment because the safety of the public would be at risk and there was a high risk that he would abscond, was not unlawful. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
” The post Congressional Investigations Under Watkins v United States appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:58 am
"--Check out Doug Berman's post on United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
This paper might be of special interest to federal courts teachers who teach United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:18 am
JD (Congo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Public Law Project intervening); WN (The Gambia) v Same; ES (Iran) v Same; MR (Bangladesh) v Same [2012] EWCA Civ 327; [2012] WLR (D) 85 “Where a claimant who had succeeded before the First-tier Tribunal but failed in the Upper Tribunal sought permission to appeal from the Upper Tribunal, not on the ground of an important point of principle or practice, but for some other compelling… [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 2:42 am
Regina (Kelly) v Secretary of State for Justice; Regina (Bailey) v Same; Regina (Gibson) v Governor of Wymott Prison Court of Appeal “In the criminal sentencing context, the court could read words into a statutory instrument to correct a drafting omission. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 2:49 am
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Vohora and Another Chancery “A claim by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry to disqualify a director of a company under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 had to be brought, rather than commenced within two years. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:36 am
TB (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “It would be wrong as a matter of principle if the Secretary of State for the Home Department could circumvent the decision of an immigration appeal tribunal by an administrative decision. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:43 am
State (No. 123), Womack v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:55 pm
Pursley (The University of Toledo College of Law) has posted Penal Deference and Other Oddities in United States V. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:08 am
” Times Law Reports, 15th June [...] [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:53 am
Regina (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions House of Lords “The policy of disentitling persons without accommodation from receiving the disability premium to which they would otherwise be entitled in their income support amounted to discrimination within article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights but was lawful as it could be justified on policy grounds. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
Regina (Tabernacle) v Secretary of State for Defence Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “A ban on innocuous activities on publicly accessible land owned by the Ministry of Defence was unlawful. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 2:25 am
Regina (TF) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “A prisoner could be transferred to a mental hospital at the end of his sentence, only if two doctors recommended it and his medical condition and treatability justified it. [read post]
