Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 156,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2025, 5:01 am
From Judge Kevin Castel's opinion Friday in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 5:00 am
In the case of Karabec-Studer v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 4:10 am
In State of Texas v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 4:05 am
, Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents: Mahmoud v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 3:52 am
New York County’s newest commercial division Justice Anar Rathod Patel’s recent decision, Lignel v Butler, No. 650791/2025 (Sup Ct, New York County 2025), holds the line: deadlock (and allegations of member oppression) are insufficient to state a claim for dissolution of an LLC that is operating in accordance with its stated purpose. [read post]
19 May 2025, 1:44 am
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in support of the Attorney General of the state of California, who is defen [read post]
18 May 2025, 10:00 pm
And the awards for mental anguish and back pay were deemed appropriate and found to be comparable to similar cases, and the civil fine was not considered disproportionate to the offense or otherwise "shocking" to its sense of fairness.Looks like these fines and penalties had teeth.# # #DECISIONIn the Matter of State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 9:05 pm
In Lucia v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 2:09 pm
Climate related risks are not going away, and the scrutiny over how they are disclosed will persist, whether under SEC regulations, state law, or shareholder pressure. [read post]
18 May 2025, 1:07 pm
If not for the unusually high deference to executive decisions on immigration policy wrongly granted by the Supreme Court in cases like Trump v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 12:21 pm
She argued as follows: Many of the most important and contested issues of U.S. copyright law-among them, its originality standard, disputes over authorship, infringement standards, fair use, equitable or monetary compensation for infringement, and preemption of state laws-are matters for statutory interpretation in a common law fashion that judges and lawyers must address with little or no help from the statute [Say what?]. [read post]
18 May 2025, 12:01 pm
The Texas Supreme Court, in Myers-Woodward, LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 8:04 am
This weekend marks a pair of defining anniversaries in the long and unfinished arc of civil rights law in the United States. [read post]
18 May 2025, 8:00 am
(NA) On Friday, the Cato Institute and I filed a Supreme Court amicus brief in Noem v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 6:30 am
For example, the 1908 case People’s Pleasure Park Co v. [read post]
17 May 2025, 3:13 pm
In Nordine v. [read post]
17 May 2025, 3:00 pm
That was done by the Supreme Court of Canada in Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
17 May 2025, 9:03 am
Fla. 2001) (“However, this case is governed either by Florida or California law, and these states have not adopted the -inevitable disclosure] doctrine nor cited PepsiCo with approval. [read post]
17 May 2025, 7:39 am
Because it knows full well that it is almost certain to lose when that question comes to the Court, at which point the government would have to openly defy "the law of the land" if it wanted the State Department and DHS and ICE and the other executive agencies to operate under its new definition of citizenship. [read post]
17 May 2025, 5:17 am
State and local public health officials are interviewing people about the foods they ate in the month before they got sick. [read post]
