Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 173,559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
And that test is the enhanced scrutiny test, as articulated in Coster v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 2:40 am
EEOC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:07 am
No serious patent practitioner will be very surprised by this headnote, which is firmly based on Art. 69 EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation and fully in line with the established national jurisprudence in the UPC member states, notably with German case law. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
One counterintuitive aspect of this First Amendment case is that the plaintiffs were, in fact, violating state insurance laws, and the defendant was responsible for enforcing those laws. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
A recent case, Ohio v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Choi at University of Michigan Law School, and Geeyoung Min at Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
I might think the Constitution should reach more of national life than another person; I think the Court was wrong, for instance, to overrule Roe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
Now, it says abortion should be left to the states. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 5:03 pm
We cited Chuck v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm
” On 2 July 2024, some arrived with placards stating: “Jurors have an absolute right to acquit a defendant according to their conscience. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:18 pm
Florida is a comparative fault state. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 2:21 pm
Build a system and mechanism to support comprehensive innovation V. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
Burnett v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 10:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 8:40 am
Benedict v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 6:52 am
” Feliciano asserts that the word “during” simply denotes a temporal connection, not a substantive one, citing United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 1:26 am
Russell Sandberg: Two Years since the Law Commission’s Weddings Report –– and precisely nothing has happened. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 10:01 pm
Hurtado v. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 6:11 pm
Binion's piece is fundamentally about the right and wrong of the situation; but if you're interested in whether it's legal for private employers to fire employees for such speech, see this article, which canvasses the state and local laws on the subject. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 2:27 pm
However, it has long been considered a fundamental right and was recognized as such by the United States Supreme Court in the 1895 case of Coffin v. [read post]