Search for: "Law v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 172,009
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2020, 6:19 am by Kayla Campbell
  « Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:33 am
Regina (F) v Secretary of State for Justice Regina (Thompson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench “In the absence of any mechanism for review, placing an offender on the sex offenders register indefinitely was a disproportionate interference with the right to respect for private and family life. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:21 am by immigrationprof
Jessica Slavin has written "Most Important United States Supreme Court Case in Refugee Law: I.N.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:40 pm by Lawrence Solum
Priester (Florida Coastal School of Law) has posted Five Answers and Three Questions after United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Control order curfew is reasonable Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:43 am
Regina (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A provision which prevented the Secretary of State for the Home Department from considering whether certain listed countries would return asylum seekers in violation of their human rights did not enact an absolute bar, but was limited in scope. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:37 am
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A challenge to the lawfulness of future removal directions did not come within the appeal regime under the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:33 am
Regina (Smith) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire; Secretary of State for Defence v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The right to life, protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, could extend to members of the Armed Forces, wherever they might be; whether it did so would depend on the circumstances of the particular case. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Sawicki (Loyola-Chicago School of Law), Rewritten Opinion: Burton v. [read post]