Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 173,636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2008, 1:56 am
MO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for Home Department Court of Appeal “Where no transitional provisions existed, applications made under a previous regime of rules would be adjudged under the current replacement rules. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:53 am
Regina (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions House of Lords “The policy of disentitling persons without accommodation from receiving the disability premium to which they would otherwise be entitled in their income support amounted to discrimination within article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights but was lawful as it could be justified on policy grounds. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:55 pm
Pursley (The University of Toledo College of Law) has posted Penal Deference and Other Oddities in United States V. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:39 am
On September 14, […] The post KEVIN YOUNG v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:41 am
The court then found Appellant guilty on […] The post EMMANUEL AKUM v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:39 am
During the stop, the […] The post DERRON DALEY v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:50 am
Read the opinion The post KEVIN CLARK v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 7:34 am
The post AZANIAH BLANKUMSEE v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
The post EDWARD WITHERSPOON v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:22 am
The post STEPHEN NIVENS v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 6:10 am
The post STEPHEN NIVENS v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
See State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:19 pm
The Syracuse Law Review seeks manuscripts that address the constitutionality of laws surrounding immigration and how the Supreme Court’s decision of United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
PITTS v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:13 am
The post WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health Queen’s Bench Division “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State for Health on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled, on appeal, to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the secretary of state, provided it acted fairly. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm
Boyce, Criminal Law 229 (3rd ed. 1982); State v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 8:53 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
It is forthcoming in Environmental Law. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:44 pm
There's clearly been a flurry of writing over the summer concerning United States v. [read post]
