Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 172,441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health Queen’s Bench Division “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State for Health on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled, on appeal, to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the secretary of state, provided it acted fairly. [read post]
12 May 2015, 8:53 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
It is forthcoming in Environmental Law. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:44 pm
There's clearly been a flurry of writing over the summer concerning United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 1:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 7:09 am
The post FRANCOIS BROWNE V. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 10:33 am
The post SEAN RICHARDSON v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:36 pm
The post STEPHEN MCDOWELL v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:37 am
The post MOISES B. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:09 am
[…] The post SHERRI KATZ v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
« Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:33 am
Regina (F) v Secretary of State for Justice Regina (Thompson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench “In the absence of any mechanism for review, placing an offender on the sex offenders register indefinitely was a disproportionate interference with the right to respect for private and family life. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:21 am
Jessica Slavin has written "Most Important United States Supreme Court Case in Refugee Law: I.N.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:40 pm
Priester (Florida Coastal School of Law) has posted Five Answers and Three Questions after United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:58 am
United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Control order curfew is reasonable Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:43 am
Regina (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A provision which prevented the Secretary of State for the Home Department from considering whether certain listed countries would return asylum seekers in violation of their human rights did not enact an absolute bar, but was limited in scope. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:37 am
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A challenge to the lawfulness of future removal directions did not come within the appeal regime under the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [read post]
