Search for: "Law v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 172,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2021, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Sawicki (Loyola-Chicago School of Law), Rewritten Opinion: Burton v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:02 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Shannon (Texas Tech University School of Law) has posted Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:47 am by Jeff Welty
United States appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:15 am
Fact sheet not unambiguous Hooper v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “A government fact sheet was not clear and unambiguous enough so that overpayments of incapacity benefit were not recoverable from a person receiving the benefit who took up part-time paid employment without notifying the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in breach of statute. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:32 am
Regina (JL) (a Youth) v Secretary of State for Justice House of Lords “A near-suicide in custody which resulted in the prisoner's mental incapacity triggered the state’s obligation to institute an independent initial investigation which complied with article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, protecting the right to life. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:36 am
Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A foreign national could not be deported on national security grounds to a state where he was at real risk of being tried on evidence obtained by torture because such an expulsion would contravene his right to a fair trial guaranteed by article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:35 am
Casewell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “The payment of an allowance to a disabled wife to pay for carer service was part of the husband's income for assessing his income support if he was that carer. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:13 am
Additional facts inadmissible in extradition Edwards v Government of United States of America “In deciding whether there was dual criminality in extradition, the domestic court was confined to the facts alleged in the offence specified in the extradition request. [read post]